Introduction
Eric Arthur Blair, more famous by his pen name George Orwell, was an enigmatic figure with an interesting background and a rich literary career. He was present and very influential during the World War I era, and most of his family was on the opposing side. Orwell was exposed to communism as he watched his friend become an active member of the Communist Party. He conducted a lot of research about totalitarian regimes and, in writing the book, he was under the influence of the totalitarian leaders in Nazi Germany and in post-war Soviet Russia. He changed the world when the ideal of a perfect society based on social justice and free from poverty, disease, and oppression was being shattered by the brutal growth of fascism in Europe—an idealistic young British writer not only lived through and participated in some of the important events of our generation but put them on paper with enormous insight, skill, and moral passion. Orwell’s personal experiences during the confusion of World War II led to the writing of 1984, a book that, for the next three-quarters of a century, would continually shock and captivate any reader who dared open its pages. 1984 sets the tone for true dystopian fiction, a novel of such world-changing and culturally affecting power that the very title of the narrative now stands as a widespread symbol for the world Orwell feared. A symbol for everything the human race must continue fighting against in our journey towards tomorrow. The year itself could be the end of the world; at least this is what George Orwell thought as he wrote. The book has been considered a comment on or a piece of political writing against totalitarian regimes. This book as political propaganda arises out of Orwell himself as an embittered intellectual. He uses his bitter experiences illustrated through the narrative to comment on totalitarianism.
Key Themes and Motifs
Several interwoven themes permeate the entirety of 1984. Critics have long hailed the novel as one of the first to delve seriously into the topic of totalitarianism and to compose a cogent vision of the ways in which surveillance, manipulation of truth, utter control, and termination of individual rights are the inevitable end state, the revealed eschaton of political ideology. Central to the horror is the role that governmental power plays in the control of perception in a society; the novel is often said to warn not against communism or socialism, per se, but against the condition of total government and total subject. Specifically, the novel is concerned with the political effects of the ways in which the manipulation of the mental worlds of those governed might operate in actuality.
Save your time!
We can take care of your essay
- Proper editing and formatting
- Free revision, title page, and bibliography
- Flexible prices and money-back guarantee
A major motif in the novel is that of language generally, and specifically the way in which words (and the shades of meanings given them) affect and inform our relationship with the world. One of the key concepts in the novel’s cultural world is that of Newspeak, the political language; but for Winston, Newspeak is not simply a tool of economic control, but is symbolic of the control of thought. The ready fabrication of axioms and control of terms by the Party not only enshrouds reality in a shroud of lies—creating persuasive fictions that can be rewritten as needed—but it also circumscribes the very means by which thoughts may be formulated and articulated. The utterance becomes devoid of potential meaning, and thus undermines the capacity to question it, or the attitudes it seeks to relay. The novel is thus not simply predicting the potential for a society of surveillance and control, but also documenting what might happen when the individual will can be subsumed by the state will. The theoretical asides into the nature of language are another strong indicator of this preoccupation. Language—the grand masterpiece of our social heritage—is thus revealed to be, potentially, a weapon by which our own power of discrimination and differentiation and free will can be constructively sidestepped. Furthermore, the Party exerts the end goal of creating doublethink, through which the populace of Oceania could be made to assent to any proposition that the Party put forward. Somewhat relatedly, Winston experiences a loss of identity to a significant extent. His name is not his name but also his number; he seems to have no place in the world except his job at the Ministry of Truth; and his life is little more than the daily hunt for the opportunity to commit treason, which is what he truly lives for. The government’s techniques of surveillance, on the other hand, impact everyone, albeit in differing degrees. The first arrest in the tale is the result of a little girl who overhears what Winston is saying to Julia. The youth seem to have constructed a private language, kept up by themselves, that lacks some of the scentsuffixes that typically give away the emotions of the speaker.
Character Analysis
Winston Smith, the main protagonist of '1984', starts as a kind of "Everyman", conforming to and accepting the totalitarian society in which he lives, but quickly develops into a main character more individual in his thoughts and feelings. At the very beginning of the book, when asked by the telescreens in his home if Big Brother is good, Winston readily agrees. As the novel unfolds, however, he begins having thoughts of rebellion, which makes him not a good person, or at least not a loyal party member. Any action anyone takes against the government is considered "wrongthink". Winston becomes the quintessential "thought-criminal". The change in him is gradual and filled with conflict. Some small action, like writing in his diary - against the law - causes him torment; others, such as buying forbidden goods, make him triumphant. This conflict is epitomized by his relationship with Julia. His survival in a non-trusting environment informs her actions, although she is not as actively worried as Winston is. Their relationship is based on the desire for personal physical freedom in a society so constrained by totalitarian control that such freedom can hardly be imagined, much less experienced. The lack of human feeling in the totalitarian society is personified by O'Brien who, at first, appears to be the novel's hero. He offers Winston and Julia a chance of escape, but reveals them to the Thought Police, betraying their trust because they betrayed his. The result of Winston's close call with capture, and the torture he endures, leads him to betray Julia as well in the end; his training at the Ministry of Love is complete. Any sliver of hope he retained - the freethinkers' "Last Man" - is vanquished, leaving a bleak space in its wake.
Political and Social Commentary
George Orwell's novel '1984' has incited important conversations as one of the foremost works of dystopian fiction. It reads as a severe, somewhat satirical critique of certain political and social tendencies Orwell perceived during his lifetime. In it, he details the grotesque overreach of government into virtually all aspects of life and critiques the resulting decay of those countries' principles. In practice, '1984' is a sort of cautionary parable—a literary work that serves as a lesson—about totalitarianism and government intervention, but it contains insights that can be extended to other social and organizational systems.
To serve as a political critique, '1984' necessitates certain preconditions in governmental organization and population norms. For instance, societal norms help cement power by demonizing any policies or actions that would alter the distrusting relationship between government and citizens. Even with control measures in place, '1984' contends that the isolated and inadequate character of underground revolutionaries would have little effect if most individuals weren't inclined to accept the Party's proclamations as the truth. In '1984', Orwell felt compelled to demonstrate the Party's propaganda and the value placed within the world, particularly within the constructive manipulation of society's members' knowledge and memories, identified in Newspeak as 'reality control'. The citizenry's flaws are such that the government can use the people's wishes to supplant reliable information with ungenuine facts. As a result, '1984' serves as a warning of the catastrophic political scene that awaits us if we resist too much the potentially dehumanizing advances in technology.
Conclusion
In conclusion, '1984' is an overarching look at the institutional regulation of our lives and the implications of a totalitarian state. If '1984' was intended as a warning, perhaps we should have heeded it sooner. As our culture has rapidly modernized, surveillance has become an integral part of our lives. Although we may not have telescreens, we have smart devices that can be hacked. Any related concerns within '1984' are noteworthy. The dystopic vision seems uncannily prophetic when one considers the totalitarian lands that have emerged, and even more so, the so-called "free world," with its democratic beliefs and despotic practices. The moral of the tale of Oceania is the educative lesson of the necessity for eternal vigilance to protect our dearly won democratic freedoms, now under threat on the home front by forces that twist truth in the modern age and the intelligence services that gather information about millions of citizens in normal times.
And like so many modern works of fiction, in the end, '1984' possesses a vital truth. The book introduces the rise of a sinister political movement that thrives on misinformation and demagoguery. Read today’s headlines about fake news, about the rise of authoritarian political figures who thrive by turning citizens against one another, and it’s hard not to feel you’ve slipped into darkness. It is artistic confirmation of the ideas we have begun to live with regard to the totalitarian dimension in light of troubled recent events. Certainly, the best examples of journalism provide an appropriate point of comparison, but more universally for the modern reader, '1984' performs the additional, almost universal service of testing to the limit our inherited value of intellectual tolerance and integrity. It makes actual our worst nightmares. '1984' is a powerful rebuke to certain approaches to international affairs, suggesting that perhaps the defense of our freedoms abroad should be pursued less forthrightly and more subtly and culturally. In lieu of such suppositions, today's citizen should instead embrace a bit of ethical humility, allowing our words and deeds to breathe into public life with greater respect for the dignity of our fellow human beings.
Stuck on your essay?
