In what way has a particular aspect, theme or text of Blakeās been adopted by at least one later artist, writer, filmmaker or musician?
William Blake was a complex character and his works are renowned for being near impossible to decipher, yet one fact we are sure of is that Blake was not a nationalist; he was a revolutionary. Yet when we look at the reception that āAnd Did Those Feet In Ancient Timesā¦ā received, a noticeable patriotic theme emerges, with the preface to the longer prophetic poem, āMiltonā, being heralded as the āunofficialā national anthem. Whether this is creating the opportunity to include the working class in the Olympic Opening Ceremony, an expression of the distinctly āBritishā nation, or simply alternative to the dreary, depressing āGod Save The Queenā, it is not what Blake intended for his work.
Save your time!
We can take care of your essay
- Proper editing and formatting
- Free revision, title page, and bibliography
- Flexible prices and money-back guarantee
Place an order
Blake lived in relative obscurity and poverty, with his works mainly recognized after his death in 1827. He was home-schooled as a child, his eccentricities proving too difficult to manage around his peers, and in 1772, he was apprenticed to the engraver James Basire for seven years, at the end of which he became a professional engraver. Whilst there is no record of any disagreement between Basire and Blake, Ackroyd notes that Blake added Basireās name to a list of artistic adversaries, and later crossed it out1 Peter Ackroyd, Blake (London: Ardent Media, 1995), p. 93. ; it is suspected that this is due to Blakeās resentment of Basireās instruction of line-engraving rather than the modern mezzotint styles, and this was detrimental to receiving recognition for his work in later life.
Perhaps the greatest influence on Blakeās work was his visions, the majority of them biblical; Henry Crabb Robison states in his diary that ā[Blakeās] faculty of vision, he says, he has had from early infancyā2 Henry Crabb Robinson, Diary, Reminiscences and Correspondence, ed. by Thomas Sadler (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), p. 21.
Gilchrist describes Blakeās first vision as such:
āOn Peckham Rye (by Dulwich Hill) it is, as he will in after years relate, that while quite a child, of eight or ten perhaps, he has his 'first vision.' Sauntering along, the boy looks up and sees a tree filled with angels, bright angelic wings bespangling every bough like starsā3 Alexander Gilchrist, Life of William Blake, 'Pictor Ignotus'(London: Macmillan and Company, 1863), p. 7.
Blakeās visions would continue to influence the work that he produced and develop a life-long fascination with religion and how it is perceived by others. Blake was further influenced by the death of his brother, Robert Blake, when he saw Robertās spirit ascend through the ceiling, a moment which upon entering William Blakeās psyche, would greatly influence his poetry. In the year following Robertās death, he appeared to Blake in a dream, showing him a new method of printing, which Blake dubbed āilluminated paintingā.
Whilst āAnd Did Those Feetā¦ā, more commonly referred to as āJerusalemā in modern culture, went largely unnoticed when Blake published it in 1804, it gained popularity in 1916 when Hubert Parry adapted Blakeās famous stanzas to lyrics, to become āJerusalemā, the hymn. Parry used a two-stanza format, adapting the poem at the request of now Poet Laureate Robert Bridges, and was written for the āFight for Rightā movement, a group created to sustain the resolve of the British Armies and population during the First World War. Parry handed the manuscript to Walford Davies, Parryās former student, and Davies recalls that āWe looked at [the manuscript] together in his room at the Royal College of Music, and I recall vividly his unwonted happiness over itā4 Jeremy Dibble, C. Hubert H. Parry: His Life and Music (Wotton-under-Edge: Clarendon Press, 1998), p. 32. .
However, Parry began to take issues with āFight For Rightā, and wrote to Sir France Younghusband in 1917 to withdraw his support. Concerns arose over the scrapping of the song entirely but were put to rest by Millicent Fawcett of the National Union of Womenās Suffrage Societies (NUWSS). The song was taken up by the Suffragists in 1917 and when asked by Fawcett if the song could be used at a Suffragist Demonstration, Parry responded that:
āI wish indeed it might become the Women Voters' hymn, as you suggest. People seem to enjoy singing it. And having the vote ought to diffuse a good deal of joy too. So they would combine happily.ā5 Dibble, p.38
Parry assigned the copyright to the NUWSS, and when that organization disbanded in 1928, the copyright was reassigned by Parryās executors to the Womenās Institutes, remaining there until 1968 when it was released into the public domain.
Parryās āJerusalemā has frequented popular culture, with many churches adopting āJerusalemā as a recessional hymn on Saint Georgeās Day. However, some clergymen of the Church of England have stated that the song is not technically a hymn, as a hymn must be a prayer to God6 'Jerusalem: An Anthem For England, dir. by (BBC, 2007). , therefore it is not sung in some churches in England, though it was sung during the wedding of Prince William and Catherine Middleton, somewhat disputing the Churchās claim.
Upon hearing the orchestral version of āJerusalemā for the first time, King George V was said to prefer it over the national anthem at the time, āGod Save The Kingā. The irony of the situation is that Blake was charged with making seditious remarks about the King and Army; therefore, on paper, āAnd Did Those Feetā certainly was not a candidate to become a national anthem. Despite Parryās attempts at using an upbeat tempo, assisted by Edward Elgarās orchestration, William Blakeās original words are rife with resentful irony, comparable to that of Shostakovichās Leningrad Symphony.
Blake asks four fundamental questions throughout the prelude, and the answer to each is ānoā. Did Christās feet ever tread in England? It harks back to the legend of Jesus walking on āEnglandās Mountains Greenā, part of the Medieval legends about King Arthur. Legend states that following Jesusā crucifixion, Joseph carried the Holy Grail to Glastonbury, proceeding to establish the first English church. Diarmaid MacCulloch, Professor of Church History, describes the legend as āTotally implausible. It obviously didn't happen.ā7 BBC, āThe strange myth in the song Jerusalemā BBC News [Online] 13 January 2016 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-35304508 Accessed 15 January 2019, Paragraph 7. So why would Blake use this myth? England, specifically London, at the time, was not somewhere Blake wished to live. He describes the ādark satanic millsā of the Industrial Revolution; Englandās āgreen and pleasant landā is a distant memory.
Blake asks four questions throughout āAnd Did Those Feetā; we know that Jesus did not walk through āEnglandās mountains greenā. The other three questions asked follow a similar suit; Was the Lamb of God seen on āEnglandās pleasant pasturesā? Did āThe Countenance Divineā shine upon our clouded hills? Was Jerusalem built among the ādark satanic millsā? We know from looking at MacCullochās answer that the Lamb of God did not meander through the Cotswolds, was not spotted in the London smog, and there was most certainly not a sense of Jerusalem in industrialized Londonās āsatanic millsā. Consequently, the fantasy of a New Jerusalem being built in England is a striking parody of Napoleonic Era Nationalism.
Rather than present a united patriotic front, āJerusalemā highlights Blakeās fears surrounding the suppression of individual spirit. The famous āsatanic millsā could refer to the Albion Flour Mills; large mills near Blakeās home in London, which were burned down following anonymously following a threat to put smaller mills out of business. If we took this as true, a strong Napoleonic image resonates with the reader. However, when Blake wrote about āmillsā in other works, he generally used the word as a metaphor for institutionalized religion, which similarly to Marx, who followed after him, he considered the natural ally for capitalism and monarchy.
The Industrial Revolution was the transition to new manufacturing processes that were more efficient, beginning in 1760 and ending around 1840, and presented a large turning point in history. A selection of economists argue that the revolution was the first time that the standard of living increased consistently. Despite this, Blake strongly opposed the ādark satanic millsā he wrote about in āAnd Did Those Feetā. Many romantic poets, including Wordsworth, were opposed to the Industrial Revolution, with Blake expressing his distaste for child labour, particularly through his work āThe Chimney Sweeperā from āSongs of Innocence and Experienceā. Blake writes āNor shall my sword sleep in my hand until we have built Jerusalemā, harking back to Bulwer-Lyttonās famous words ā āthe pen is mightier than the swordā8 Edward Bulwer Lytton Baron Lytton, Richelieu, Or, The Conspiracy: A Play in Five Acts (Michigan: Baker, 1896). . By passionately writing this, Blake is declaring his opposition for the industrial revolution, his distaste for the āsatantic millsā that ruin Englandās āpleasant pastures greenā. He is vowing to, with the support of other romantic writers he encountered ā he was known to have met Paine, Fuseli and Wordsworth at Joseph Johnsonās house ā attempt to combat the āimpuritiesā contaminating his potential āJerusalemā.
When considering Blakeās apocalyptic vision, āValaā, we see why āJerusalemā is not designed to become a national anthem of any variety. Throughout nine successive nights, Blake has visions of the universe unravelling, and the ninth night, mystery is removed from the world, with āthe dark religions [departing] and sweet science reignsā. The spirit, Tharmas, declares:
āArt thou she that made the nations drunk with the cup of Religion?ā declares the spirit Tharmas. āGo down, ye Kings and Counsellors and Giant Warriorsā¦Go down with horse and Chariots and Trumpets of hoarse war⦠Let the slave, grinding at the mill, run out into the field. Let him look up into the heavens and laugh in the bright air.ā
What we can take from this passage is that Blakeās views on Royalty, Organised Religion, and Mills ā previously discussed as a metaphor for industrialization ā are not positive. This highlights the irony of Parryās work to turn āAnd Did Those Feetā into a nationalist anthem to rally patriotic support; Blake harboured a distaste for everything that represented nationalism. Following his trial for high treason, in which a drunken soldier caused a fight in the garden of his sequestered cottage, with the red coat boasting about being āthe kingās soldierā, to which Blake replied, āDamn the King, and you tooā9 Alexander Gilchrist, Life of William Blake, 'Pictor Ignotus'(London: Macmillan and Company, 1863), p. 173 , showing that Blakeās original intentions were not for his words to be used as a way of supporting the King and Country.
Whittaker and Whitson state that āBlake, himself, in many respects, failed to recognise the full significance of the text he composedā10 Roger Whitson, Jason Whittaker, William Blake and the Digital Humanities: Collaboration, Participation, And Social Media(Oxon: Routledge, 2013), p. 73-74. , and it only appears on two out of four copies of āMiltonā (Copy A and Copy B). āAnd Did Those Feetā was aimed at finding a wider readership for Blake, yet Essick and Viscomi explain that, when confident that the preface would find a wider readership, ā[that confidence] Blake may have lost by the time he collated the two later copiesā11 William Blake, Milton, A Poem: And The Final Illuminated Works, ed. by Robert N. Essick, Joseph Viscomi (New Jersey: Princeton University press, 1998), p. 40.
Bentley states that āWilliam Blake was a visionaryā12 G.E. Bentley, The Stranger from Paradise: A Biography of William Blake (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001). , and whilst the simplicity of the statement may incite devoted critics, it is nonetheless true. Blake conversed with angels and his deceased brother and following the previously discussed āPeckham Ryeā vision, he continued to have visions throughout his life that drove his creative works. Blake was reportedly suspicious of memory, with Rowland stating that ā[memory is] the mere repetition of that which was received without that enhancement of that which has been received through the creativity of the visionary imaginationā13 Christopher Rowland, 'Blake and the Bible: Biblical Exegesis in the Work of William Blake', International Journal of Systematic Theology, 7.2, (2005), 142-154 (p. 143). . Blake viewed himself as in the same league as Prophets, if not one himself; combined with his visions, in the Preface to Milton, he quotes Bible Verse 11:29 ā āWould to God that all the Lordās people were prophetsā ā suggesting that he himself was some form of a modern prophet. Blake has a sense of insight and prophetic vision equipped in order to provide an explanation as to the meaning of the current events he experienced. Blake continued to recognize the prophets of the bible as interconnected beings; he dines with Isiah and Ezekiel in āThe Marriage of Heaven and Hellā.
Blake creates his own idiosyncratic faith, the major hero of which is Los, whoās figure as a prophetic role is exponentially explored; Blake can manipulate the prophetās style and prophecies. Blake explains in 1798 that his prophecies were not intended to predict what would happen:
āJonah was no prophet, in the modern sense, for his prophecy of Nineveh failed. Every honest man is a prophet; he utters his opinion both of private and public matters⦠A Prophet is a Seer, not an Arbitrary Dictatorā14 William Blake, Annotations to Richard Watson, An Apology for the Bible, in a Series of Letters Addressed to Thomas Paine, reprint edn (Cardiff: University College Cardiff Press, 1984), p. 392.
The prophecies propose the bare bones of the dynamic history of revolution, highlighting the potential for positive change marred with the corrupt impulses that humans possess. The optimism that Blake potentially harboured towards the end of the eighteenth century is forced to compete with his desire to explore the complex nature of human nature and the probability of succumbing to the ādark delusionsā of the world. Europe was to be briefly lit with the flame of revolution, yet with the failure of the French Revolution, the continent is seen as sleepy and immune to this spirit of change15 See L. Tannenbaum, Biblical Tradition in Blakeās Early Prophecies: The Great Code of Art (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982), p. 168; C. Burdon, The Apocalypse in England: Revelation Unravelling 1700ā1834 (London: Macmillan, 1977), pp. 180ā208; and M.J. Tolley, āEurope āto those ychaind in sleepā ā, in D. Erdman and J. Grant, Blakeās Visionary Forms Dramatic (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970). , entangled with religion and an ethic that resists any form of revolutionary change.
In the preface to āMiltonā we find a selection of the recurring themes in Blakeās works: his campaign against an education based solely on memory, and Rowland showed us that Blake is suspicious of memory, rather than inspiration. According to Goslee, Blake possessed the āconviction that the domination of classical culture had quenched the vitality of biblical inspiration.ā16 N. Goslee, āāIn Englandās green & pleasant landā: The Building of Vision in Blakeās Stanzas from Miltonā, Studies in Romanticism 13 (1974), pp. 105ā25. . The idea of a āNew Jerusalemā presented in āAnd Did Those Feetā was not a far-off dream nor as remote as it seemed, but a possibility of a better England, something purer and without the mechanical influences of the industrial revolution; something built to represent Englandās āgreen and pleasant landā.
When exploring Blakeās poem, āAnd Did Those Feetā, and the reception it received, we see that Blakeās history and his intentions for the preface were morphed through Parryās setting of the preface to music. Whilst minor revisions of the poem had been made beforehand, none had the consequences of Parryās. Both the preface and the poem went unnoticed in Blakeās lifetime, therefore Blakeās feelings on how his work was adapted will never be definitively known, however, we can draw some conclusions. Following his arrest and attempted charge of high treason, we can conclude with reasonable certainty that Blake would not have been a supporter of āJerusalemā as a national anthem. Despite this, there is still significant calls for āJerusalemā to replace āGod Save The Queenā, so much so that it is used before England National Team Rugby and Cricket matches as opposed to āGod Save The Queenā, a fact that supporters of these sports are quite passionate about.
āAnd Did Those Feetā has taken on more modern adaptions as well; a popular Netflix animated TV show, āNeo Yokioā, uses āJerusalemā as itās fictional countryās national anthem, replacing āEnglandā with āYokioā. This provides an interesting point surrounding Blakeās intentions for the preface; not only was it used long after it was first published as a national anthem, a rallying cry of sorts, centuries on it is still being adapted as a fictional national anthem. This suggests that while Blake did not intend for this purpose, the ādeath of the authorā principle has taken over, with the opposite of what Blake wanted becoming the main use for his work. Unlike Neo Yokio, however, is the 1981 film āChariots of Fireā, which takes itās inspiration from the line āBring me my chariot of fireā, a film which embodies the beliefs that Blake and his wife, Catherine, held.
This essay was started exploring the patriotic themes of Blakeās āAnd Did Those Feetā, and whilst it was not written with the intention of stirring up patriotic pride, it did so anyway, adapted by the Suffragette movement and many other organizations throughout centuries to create national pride, whether fictional or realistic. Despite its unintended uses, critics cannot dispute that whilst its effects were unintended, āAnd Did Those Feetā remains one of Blakeās most poignant works, despite its status as merely a preface to a larger poem.
Bibliography
- Ackroyd, Peter, Blake (London: Ardent Media, 1995)
- (BBC, 2007), 'Jerusalem: An Anthem For Englandā
- BBC, āThe strange myth in the song Jerusalemā BBC News [Online] 13 January 2016 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-35304508 Accessed 15 January 2019
- Bentley, G.E. The Stranger from Paradise: A Biography of William Blake (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001).
- Blake, William, Annotations to Richard Watson, An Apology for the Bible, in a Series of Letters Addressed to Thomas Paine, reprint edn (Cardiff: University College Cardiff Press, 1984)
- Blake, William, Milton, A Poem: And The Final Illuminated Works, ed. by Robert N. Essick, Joseph Viscomi (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1998)
- Bulwer Lytton, Edward, Richelieu, Or, The Conspiracy: A Play in Five Acts (Michigan: Baker, 1896)
- Dibble, Jeremy, C. Hubert H. Parry: His Life and Music (Wotton-under-Edge: Clarendon Press, 1998)
- Gilchrist, Alexander, Life of William Blake, 'Pictor Ignotus'(London: Macmillan and Company, 1863)
- Goslee, N. āāIn Englandās green & pleasant landā: The Building of Vision in Blakeās Stanzas from Miltonā, Studies in Romanticism 13 (1974), pp. 105ā25.
- Robinson, Henry Crabb, Diary, Reminiscences and Correspondence, ed. by Thomas Sadler (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)
- Rowland, Christopher, 'Blake and the Bible: Biblical Exegesis in the Work of William Blake', International Journal of Systematic Theology, 7.2, (2005), 142-154
- Tannenbaum, L. Biblical Tradition in Blakeās Early Prophecies: The Great Code of Art (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982), p. 168; C. Burdon, The Apocalypse in England: Revelation Unravelling 1700ā1834 (London: Macmillan, 1977)
- Tolley, M.J. āEurope āto that chaindā in sleepā ā, in D. Erdman and J. Grant, Blakeās Visionary Forms Dramatic (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970).
- Whitson, Roger, Jason Whittaker, William Blake, and the Digital Humanities: Collaboration, Participation, And Social Media(Oxon: Routledge, 2013) FUL15593115 Single Author Study: A ENL3085M